Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KLINE Melissa C. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
2 | SHIH Diane | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
3 | OH Erin H. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
3 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
5 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
6 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
7 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
8 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
9 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
10 | CHO Inga | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
11 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
12 | LEE Paulina | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
13 | TRASKUNOV Alisa G. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
14 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
15 | VOHRA Anusha | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
17 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
18 | HUANG NATALIE | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
19 | DING Abigail | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
20 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
21 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
22 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
23 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
24 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
25 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 32% |
26 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
28 | DE LA CRUZ Ava | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
29 | XIE zoey | 2% | 11% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
30 | KALE Anika A. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
31 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
32 | XU Madison | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
33 | KANG Jiyoon | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
34 | MICHAELSEN Emily | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
35 | FUNG Carina W. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
37 | LEE Isabelle | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
38 | TAN Clarisse | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
39 | OWEN Ashley | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
40 | HU Victoria | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | - |
41 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
42 | COKER Bettina M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
43 | SEEBERG Shelbie N. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
44 | WEBB Ella | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
45 | YU Jaime L. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
46 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
47 | LONG Madeline M. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
48 | NARANG Maya | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
49 | MALTMAN Claire | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
50 | XUE Alanna | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
51 | LEE Montana | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
52 | BASSON Bayley D. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
53 | DIERKS Kaya | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | DU Hannah | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
56 | HO Rachel E. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
57 | KUMAR Anmol | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
58 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | PARK Jaimie Lina | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
60 | LIU Sophia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
61 | CLEVENGER Estella | 17% | 47% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
62 | KELBLEY Elena J. | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
63 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
64 | HSIUNG Samantha | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
65 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
66 | KURCHIN Ekaterina Y. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
67 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
68 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
69 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
70 | NOVIKOV Sienna | 41% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
71 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
72 | MI Anning | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
73 | JULIUS Sonia | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
74 | PFLAUM Philippa J. | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
75 | SASSE Savitri A. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | CLEVENGER Magdalena | 12% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
77 | SHORI Manisha K. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
78 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
79 | VAUGHN Sabrina | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
80 | KEEFER Corinne | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.