Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
2 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
3 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | - | - | 3% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
3 | MCALISTER Ian | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
5 | HERNDON Liam | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
6 | MEHROTRA Neel | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
7 | MANGAN Hunter | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
8 | RAO Neil | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
9 | GONZALEZ Kian | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
10 | LESCURE Dimitri | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
11 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
12 | CHEN Leetyan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
13 | PEREZ Daniel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
14 | TIEMANN Landen | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
15 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | POHL Philip | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
18 | SURESH NEERAJ | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
19 | JIANG Raymond | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
20 | SCEROLER Anslee | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
21 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
22 | OLSON Joseph | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
23 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
24 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
25 | PATEL Avi S. | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
26 | RINDER Kaess | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
27 | RODRIGUEZ Alejandro | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.