Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 3 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 6 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
| 7 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 8 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 9 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% |
| 10 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 11 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 12 | HAMZA Malak | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 13 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
| 15 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 16 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% |
| 18 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 19 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 20 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% |
| 21 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 23 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 24 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 26 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 28 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 29 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
| 30 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 31 | ROY Layla | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 32 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 98% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 34 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 35 | CHUNG Jaein | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 36 | TANG AI JIA | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 37 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 41 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 44 | HU Felice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 45 | WU Celine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 46 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 48 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 52 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | SHINKAREV Olga | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 55 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 56 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 62 | GAMRADT Taylor | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 64 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | UPTON Sydney | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | ZHUANG Christina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 68 | NOVIKOV Allegra | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | MI Aileen | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | SHORI Samantha | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | ZHUANG Sophie | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 74 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 75 | CUI Amy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 76 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 87% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 89% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 82 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | THOMAS Saejel | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | LI Irina | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 87 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 88 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 89 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 90 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | TSANG Catherine | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | DESOLA Lyla | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | SHIM Grace | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 94 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 96 | DESOLA Lucy | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | STEINHOBEL Jade | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.