Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% |
2 | PAN Henry | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
3 | DOELL Ethan | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | PRUT Anton | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
5 | KOE Beckett | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 37% | 6% |
6 | HE Kyle | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
7 | LEON Nicolas | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
8 | MILES Greyson | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
9 | HUTH Trevor | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% |
10 | RIVERA IVAN | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 4% |
11 | HARKINS Asher | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - |
12 | SALAZAR Tomas D. | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
13 | GRIEB Oliver | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% |
14 | ROTHMAN Matthew | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
14 | LEE Noah | 1% | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 1% |
16 | LEE Junehyuk | 9% | 42% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 1% | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 1% |
17 | GRACEY Gavin | 1% | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
19 | KIMURA Ryo | 18% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | METZ Mason | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
21 | MOE Annan | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
22 | SHULER Alden | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | PARMAR Veer | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
24 | REBNER Parker | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
25 | CHOW Kingsley | 26% | 50% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
26 | LIU hangda | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
27 | FLYNN Oliver | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | GILLIAM Elijah | 40% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
27 | FERRONE Nate | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | FAUERBACH James | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.