Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HONDA Kazu Z. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 62% |
| 2 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | MARTOS Jimmy | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 3 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 5 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 6 | NAGER Noah | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 7 | KIM Aaron J. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 8 | MCCORD Clark | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 9 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 56% | 19% |
| 10 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | |
| 11 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 12 | WANG Andrew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 13 | LI Jiaan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 14 | HAN Andersen Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 15 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 16 | GHAZALI Omer | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 18 | TSAI Philip W. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
| 19 | JIN Honggu | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | WITTENBERG Jackson H. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 21 | BAE Kevin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | LI James | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 23 | CHEN Jr. William | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 24 | XIAO Anthony | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 25 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 26 | MARSHALL Ian | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 27 | LAO Scott E. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WU Jerry | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 30 | ESTEVES Dionel L. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 32 | TIAN Aaron C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 33 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% |
| 34 | DROUTMAN Ryan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
| 37 | SHA Yi Peng | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 38 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 40 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | HSIUNG Richie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 42 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 43 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 44 | RILEY Brad | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 45 | FONG Colin J. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 46 | DESOLA Damian C. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | CHREKY Jacob D. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 47 | CAI Oliver K. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 49 | FINLEY Dylan | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | HOU Kenneth | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 51 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GU Hubert | 9% | 36% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | BELLUOMO David C. | 4% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | SONG Dylan S. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 55 | OBERYSZYN Evan | 17% | 48% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZHAO Jesse | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | DAUM Charlie | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 58 | TSAI Max W. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 59 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 61 | KIM Derek A. | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | VLACK Felix | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | FU Yifan | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | LO Hung Yui | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 66 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 67 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | BLOCK William J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 71 | FRATIAN Mihai | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 72 | PIERCE Logan | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | CHEUNG Kevin | 17% | 45% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 74 | CLAVIJO-GOMEZ Santiago A. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | DONDERIS AJ | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | VO Jonathan | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Thales | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | LI Ryan Z. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | DRESSEL Jet | 9% | 53% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.