Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | GOLIYAD Lisa | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
| 3 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
| 3 | WONG Angelina | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% | |
| 5 | HOWARD Katherine | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 6 | GANSER Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 63% |
| 7 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 8 | PETROFF Eva | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 9 | NING Miranda | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 10 | BURROWS Beatrice | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 11 | YAO Sophia | 4% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 12 | SHETH Anayaà | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | CHEN Madeline | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | SONG Charlotte | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 15 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | CHOU Andrea | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | WONG Sydney | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 18 | YOUN Emily | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 4% | |
| 19 | LAU Karina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | YU Livia | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 21 | JU Jennifer | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | HAN Emma | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 23 | JIANG chenxi | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CHEN Laila | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | CHEN Allison | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ALLIEVI Simone | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | FAYLAYEV Sofia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YARBILOVA Aya | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 29 | WU Madisen | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 30 | LAW Mila | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | DING Iris Siyue | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | TIAN Victoria | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | KAKANI Aditi | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% | |
| 35 | XIAO Katelyn G. Xiao | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | XU Mulan | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 38 | MALIK zara | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | WORMHOOD Alexa | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | RAJPUT Mahek | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | PINCHUK Yael | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | NOONAN Jane | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | TANG Jacquelyn | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
| 44 | DIETIKER Claire | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 45 | KOESTERS Florentine | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Abigail | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | SULLIVAN Adela | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | LEE Zoe | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.