Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 3 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 3 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 5 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 2% | ||
| 6 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 7 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | |
| 8 | ALUF Brendon | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
| 10 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 10% | ||
| 11 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 12 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 4% |
| 13 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | STOLCKE Julian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 16 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | ||
| 17 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% | |
| 18 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | PARK Sean | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 20 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 21 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | HAHN EVER | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
| 24 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | BLAIR Campbell | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | HU Simon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 29 | OGELE Joshua | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MERZLYAKOV VLadimir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 31 | PARK Layne | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | ||
| 34 | MARTIRE Francis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 34 | ALLEN Parker | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 36 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BORNHOLZ Lawrence | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | ZHERENOVSKY Alan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | HONG Isaac | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | IP Hunter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 42 | VITALE Mateo | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | CHENG Shane | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LI Lucas | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | LI Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LEE Shane Gunn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 47 | DAI Ethan | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | ||
| 48 | CHEN Joshua | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | ||
| 49 | PARROCO Jacob | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 50 | LEE Jeffrey | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | BURNS Carson | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | PATEL Rohan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 53 | NGUYEN Brady | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 54 | PALERMO Evan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 55 | HAZANOVICH Adam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | RAJ Adithya | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | KRISHNARASA Aiyann | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | HUANG KIMBALL | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | ||
| 59 | XU Jayden | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | CHEN Mark | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | LI Felix | 100% | 48% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.