Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOMER Daryl D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 2 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
| 3 | SPEAR Jeff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 5 | METRYKA Karol | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 6 | COHEN Josef A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 7 | WALKER Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 5% |
| 8 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 9 | GUY Philippe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 10 | SHAINBERG Jonah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 4% |
| 11 | KOLASA Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 11 | SARON Mitchell S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | DODDO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 14 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 15 | SOUDERS Peter F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 16 | FIELDS Malcolm D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 18 | COSTIN Michael V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 19 | LANDAU Nathaniel (Nat) B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 20 | IGOE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | |
| 21 | ARMIJO Gabriel K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 5% |
| 22 | DI TELLA Pascual M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | LEUNG Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | MOON Sean H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | CONTRERAS Alessandro | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 27 | BIVINS III George A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | DESCHERER David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | GOODE Matthew (Matt) G. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | LORTKIPANIDZE Guram | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 31 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | FARFAN-BAYERL Inti | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | ELSISSY Ziad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 34 | CAI Erwin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 35 | LINDER James (Luke) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 36 | CENTANNI Salvatore (Sal) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 37 | STONE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 9% |
| 38 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 39 | DEL VECCHIO Nicolas (None PLEASE) S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 40 | MERCHANT Marcel J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 41 | LEVITT Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | PROCHNIAK Evan A. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PANTELEEV Arsenii | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | KIM Charlson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | SPEAR Will | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 48 | MA Jonathan D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | LIU Jesse Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | MULLENNIX Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | CHAN Zachary D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 52 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | ZHAO Raymond H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 54 | KULDELL Spencer D. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | SMITH Jared C. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BAK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 56 | WALKER Dalton F. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 58 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 17% |
| 59 | KIM Brian S. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | TE VELDE Noah C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | PARK Donghwan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 62 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | JOHNSON Zachary (Zack) C. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | MERCHANT Julian T. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 21% | 1% | ||
| 65 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 66 | CAMPBELL Colin B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 67 | ATTIG Will T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 68 | MARSEE James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 70 | LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% |
| 71 | FLORES Gerardo (Gerardito) D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 72 | ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 73 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 74 | DEMAREST Iain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% |
| 74 | CHEN Andrew M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 76 | SHIN Richard J.H. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 77 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 77 | XU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 79 | HARLEY Colby A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 80 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | TONG Qilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% |
| 82 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 83 | LIN John A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | |
| 84 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | ||
| 85 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 86 | KANARY Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 87 | KIM Stephen E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 88 | BOOTH Zaheer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 89 | PREVEY-SULLIVAN Owen D. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | BERGMAN Thomas C. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 91 | DANNULL Linus N. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 92 | DRESSELL Wiley | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 93 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 94 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 95 | OSTER Keegan J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 96 | PRICE Jack S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 96 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 98 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 99 | DINU Nicholas D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 99 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 101 | MULVANEY Alec S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 102 | MATHEWS Stephen O. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 103 | COPELAND Oliver E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 104 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 105 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 106 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 107 | LEVITT Teddy H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 108 | REN Junming | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | ||
| 109 | SCHINDLER Zachary (Milo) | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 110 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 111 | SMITH David C. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 112 | KARAM Tariq A. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 113 | WALKER III Alex | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 114 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 114 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 116 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 117 | AURAY Phileas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 118 | GREMILLION Ezekiel R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 119 | JULIEN William A | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 120 | CHEN Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 120 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 120 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 123 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 124 | HARLEY Sage N. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 125 | RICHARDSON Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 126 | SAKHAMURI Surya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 126 | HEATHCOCK Colin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 128 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 129 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 130 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 130 | PETWAY Justin E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 132 | HU William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 133 | HUSSAIN Faaris Zulfiqar | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 134 | RAMAN Easwer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 135 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 136 | GOTTSCHALK Alexander P. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 137 | SIERADZKY Dawson | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 138 | HAN Nicholas | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 139 | HEINTZ Evin Y. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 140 | BOLTON Dawson E. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | ||
| 141 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 142 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 143 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 144 | RAINVILLE-POND Schuyler J. | 100% | 70% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 145 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 146 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 147 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 148 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 149 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 150 | VACCARI Braden | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 151 | HAYES Matthew T. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 152 | YOUNG Nash | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 153 | QIU Le | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 154 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 154 | FEENEY Sean | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 154 | KANG Brandon M. | 100% | 79% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 154 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 158 | BARNETT Peter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 159 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 160 | VAULES Charles W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 161 | YUNGEBERG Tyler R. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 161 | YEN Joshua C. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 163 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 164 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Akhil | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 165 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | 3% | |
| 166 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% | |
| 167 | GAFFNEY John M. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 168 | LIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 169 | CHANG Howard | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 169 | WU Nicholas R. | 100% | 66% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 169 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 172 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 173 | BURR Tanner B. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 174 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 175 | FILS-AIME Jacob E. | 100% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 176 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 176 | YATES Colum C. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.