MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ROZALSKI Eli | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | VANOYEN Dominick | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | D V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
3 | ARATA Connor | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
5 | RAJPAL Alastair | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
6 | LEE Ian | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
8 | ZHENG Marcus | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
9 | SOYSKI Harrison Q. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
10 | NOWAK Joseph A. | V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
11 | LEYVA MATOS Danyer | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
12 | KENNEDY Michael | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
13 | FRASER Rhys | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita I. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | STRINGER David | V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | BERSCHEID Arthur | V V V D D D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
17 | EDWARDS Connor | V V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
18 | NAZARIO Dominic | V V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | MAVANI Krishna | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
20 | HEYBOER Jason | D V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
21 | HERRERA Xavier | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
22 | WENGER Liam | V D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
23 | SILVA Alexander Ryan | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
24 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
25 | SMITH Erick | D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
25 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | ZMUDA Aiden | D V D V V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
28 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | D V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
29 | TOWNE Benjamin | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
30 | JUSCINSKI Michal | V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | DECKER Evan M. | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
32 | SIMONS Henry | D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
33 | KOLACKI Gabriel | D V V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
34 | IRVINE Brody | V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
35 | MICK Gabriel | V D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
36 | KAGAN Noah | V V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
37 | STORER Alexander | V D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
38 | ZINSER Jamie | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
39 | FREDERICK David R. | D V D V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
40 | TAGORE Reyansh | D D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
41 | POWELL Sean | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
42 | DEPP Edward | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
42 | HICKNER Gabe | D D D V V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
44 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
45 | NEGGIE James | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
45 | DRAWZ Chase | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
47 | CRUZ Ben | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
48 | BENSCH Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
49 | ZHANG Hanson | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
50 | MCGRATH Milo | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
51 | POLYZOIS Alkis | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
52 | SCOTT Alex | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
53 | TERPSTRA Clive | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.