Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MCDONALD Finn | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
2 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
3 | MIAO Heqi | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
3 | LAMTAN Christoffer | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
5 | KOZLOV Lucas | - | - | 1% | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
6 | ZWAKA Jonas | - | - | 3% | 18% | 49% | 30% | |
7 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
8 | LEVIN Jacob | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
9 | AGARWAAL Yohan | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
10 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
10 | HAHN EVER | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
12 | KHANNA Adamantis | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
13 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | - | - | 2% | 14% | 47% | 38% | |
14 | SONG Aidan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
15 | ROPER F. Elijah | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
16 | BARENBOYM Michael | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
17 | LUCAS William | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
18 | NG oliver | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
19 | LIU ERIC | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
20 | LORENZ Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
21 | LEE Ryan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
22 | SUBA Mason | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
23 | MERMEGAS Alexander | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
24 | MARTINSON Torm | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
25 | DAI Zihou | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
26 | OREN Daniel | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
27 | LAU Kyrus | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
28 | LIANG Morgan | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
29 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
30 | CHANG Timothy | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
31 | WU Vincent | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
32 | SUH Leo | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
33 | TRZEPLA Max | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
34 | LIN Brendan | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
35 | MATTOO Dhruv | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
36 | IVRON Daniel | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
37 | WANG Theodore | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
38 | LEE Shane Gunn | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
39 | SO Morgan | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
40 | NARAYAN Rishi | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
40 | LI Michael | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | WAXLER Alex | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
43 | DAYAMA Ronak | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
44 | SAYAR Luke | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
45 | LEIGH Brayden | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
46 | WONG Reagan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
47 | O'KEEFE Brody | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | PARROCO Andrew | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
49 | MENZIES Liam | 38% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | CHANG Liam | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
51 | BROOKS Drake | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
52 | ANTONIO Elan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
53 | CHAN Ewan | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
54 | BENNETT Lachlan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
55 | VISH Manyu | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
56 | KURIYAMA Marcus | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
57 | MHLEY Gavin | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
58 | KOSMIN Ivan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
59 | CHAVAN Aditya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
60 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | TITOV Zachary | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
62 | IMANUEL Ethan | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
63 | HE Nolan | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | LI Lucas | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
65 | LI Kent | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
66 | VITALE Mateo | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | GAIDA Ashton | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
68 | LO Shih-Hsuan Elroy | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | BURNS Carson | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | CHERNAEV Antonio | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
71 | WANG Harrison | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
71 | YURCISIN Harrison | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
73 | TUNIK Joshuah | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
74 | ZHERENOVSKY Alan | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
75 | DAI Ethan | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
76 | HE Eric | 26% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | PATEL Kiran | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
78 | MITHUN Prabal | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
79 | LEE Jeffrey | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | GOLDSTEIN alexander | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
80 | DY Azriel | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
82 | HUANG Anthony | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.