MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MCISAAC Finn | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | CHUANG Oscar | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | HOWLAND Jonas | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | SENIC Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | BERSCHEID Arthur | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 7 | GUTH Joseph | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 8 | STRINGER David | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 9 | LIU Yinhong | V V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
| 10 | MASSIMINO Andrew | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | D V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | KUE Temujin | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | MAVANI Krishna | V D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 16 | DENG Kenny | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | SLUSHER Gideon | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 | |
| 17 | ARATA Connor | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | ATKINSON JOSIAH | V V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | FANG Haoyu | D D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | IRVINE Brody | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | RAJPAL Alastair | V D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | HEYBOER Jason | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | TOWNE Benjamin | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 25 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | D V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | FRASER Rhys | D V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | HERRERA Xavier | V D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 28 | VANOYEN Dominick | D D V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 29 | ZMUDA Aiden | V D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 30 | DUNLAP Ian | D V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 31 | MICK Gabriel | V D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 32 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | D D D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 33 | LATORRE Leonardo | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | KAGAN Noah | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | SILVA Alexander Ryan | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | NAZARIO Dominic | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 38 | TAGORE Reyansh | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | REAUME Nate | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 40 | CHASE Crosby | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 41 | KNIBBE Nathan | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 42 | XU Rambert | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 43 | DRAWZ Chase | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 44 | CHAN William | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 44 | YATES Graeme | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 46 | TERPSTRA Clive | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 47 | SIMONS Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 48 | TATE Liam | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 48 | POLYZOIS Alkis | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.