Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
2 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
3 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
3 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
5 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
6 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
7 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 15% |
8 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | |
9 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
10 | WANG Carol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
10 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
12 | CAO Amelie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
13 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
14 | KIM Claire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
15 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
16 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 6% |
17 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
18 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
19 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 17% | 1% |
20 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
21 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
22 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
23 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% |
24 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
25 | WANG Dina C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
26 | HU Sophie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
27 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% |
28 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | 2% | |
29 | HUANG Sophie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
31 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
32 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
33 | SUN Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
34 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
35 | MOORE Addisyn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
36 | LI Katerina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
37 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 3% |
38 | WANG Annie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 7% | - |
39 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
40 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 15% | |
41 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 16% | |
42 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 100% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
43 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | |
44 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
45 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
46 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
47 | BO Iris | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | LEE Jeemin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
49 | LIU Caydence | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
50 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | - |
51 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
52 | LIU Yinuo | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
53 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
54 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | |
55 | DESERANNO Seren | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
56 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
57 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
58 | PAN Yiran | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | KOU Elisha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
60 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 98% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
61 | KO Darby | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
62 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
63 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
64 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | ZONG Melody | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
66 | TELEB Farida | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
67 | ORRINGER Lottie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
68 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
69 | ARRAIANO Olivia R. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
70 | PEVZNER Sophia | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
71 | LEE Allison | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
72 | SHUTZER Lily | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
73 | GOLDBERG Talia | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
74 | DINAR Julia | 100% | 89% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
75 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 4% | - | |
76 | GE Lena Lan | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
77 | CHOI Cara | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
78 | BRODY Coco | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 88% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
79 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
81 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
82 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 89% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
83 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 99% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
83 | WAN Celine | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
85 | FEDER Acadia | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
86 | STEWART Isla | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
87 | WU Lorena | 100% | 99% | 79% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
88 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
89 | SHANG Arianna | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
90 | RAFFAELE Nancy | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
90 | HASSANEIN Aicha | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
92 | REZA Fukaina | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
93 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.