Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
2 | ZHANG Selina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
3 | LUO Lucy | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
3 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
5 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
6 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
7 | JOO Sara | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
8 | YANG Olivia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
9 | CHENG Audrey | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
10 | ZHENG Annalyn | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
11 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
12 | WANG Joann | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
13 | WU Gloria | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
14 | ZHU Audrey | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
15 | AI Mirabelle | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
16 | PAK Rosa | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
17 | CHEN Yinuo | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
18 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
19 | MA Sophia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
20 | ZHANG Ziru | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | LEE Annabel | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | KIM Yuna | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
23 | PAEK Ellie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
24 | LIU Anya | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
25 | HUANG Emma | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
26 | KASHUBA Mila | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
27 | WANG Manny | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
28 | JU Victoria | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
29 | WANG Sally | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
30 | WANG Kelly | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
31 | CULLIVAN Elise | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
32 | KIM Lael | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
33 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
34 | WANG Christina | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
35 | CHAN Hailey | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
36 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
37 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
38 | CHEN bridgette | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
39 | WANG Christina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | YANG Catherine | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
41 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
42 | MCCLAIN Madison | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
43 | WU Karina | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | HUANG Jiayu | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
45 | JIANG Ziqi | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
46 | MCCLAIN Grayce | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
47 | DONG Audrey | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
48 | FAROOQI Eliora | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
49 | PAK Emmalyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
50 | DOMINIK Eliana | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | MILLER Anna | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
52 | YAN Elena | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
53 | JIN Kerina | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
54 | MA Laurie | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | SHI Cathy | 12% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
56 | FANG Savannah | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
57 | DONG CAROLINE | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
58 | YANG rachel | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | LIU Bella | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
60 | CHANG Eleanor | 1% | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
61 | CHAN Jaclyn | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
62 | BAX Mila | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
63 | CLOUD Chrystie | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
64 | KAGAN Natalie | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
65 | LU Allison | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
66 | ZHAO Sophia | - | < 1% | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
67 | NAUTIYAL Asha | 12% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
68 | LUXIEO Cathy | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
69 | LIU Zihe | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
70 | CHUNG Sera | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
71 | LIANG Qiyue | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
72 | XU Elaina | < 1% | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
73 | TELEB Amina | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
74 | XU Eileen | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | PATEL Tiana | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
76 | CHOI Serine | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.