Georgia International Convention Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG YIRAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | HU Jenna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 3 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 3 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 5 | WANG YiXi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 6 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 7 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 8 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 9 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 10 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 12 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 13 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 15 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 16 | WYNN Kylie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 19 | ZHOU Chenchu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 21 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 22 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 23 | ZOU Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 24 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 25 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | SUN Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 27 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 28 | WANG CAROL | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 29 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 30 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 31 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 32 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 33 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 34 | HU Felice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 35 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 36 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | XIA youyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 39 | OH Ceana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 40 | AADHI Hansika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 41 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 42 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 43 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 44 | LIU Enjia Sherry liu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 45 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 8% | |
| 46 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 47 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 49 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | |
| 51 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
| 52 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 53 | WU Nicole Moxuan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 54 | PARK Zena | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 55 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | WATSON Evelyn | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | LI Katerina | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | KIM Claire | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | CAO Kayla | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 64 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 66 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 67 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 68 | SHTEPA Rada | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 69 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 70 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 71 | XIE Su | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 72 | LI Alice | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 73 | BAE Yooju | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 74 | WANG DINA C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 75 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 75 | YONG Rosalind | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 77 | POEI Lauren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 78 | KIM Sydney | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 79 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 80 | LI Joy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 80 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 82 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 82 | SONG Jenna | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 84 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 85 | BURBERRY Livia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 86 | WANG Annie | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 87 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 90 | BUDKO Julia | 100% | 95% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 91 | EYER Brooke | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 92 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | BORGES Valeryn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 94 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 95 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 96 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 97 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | KIM Lauren | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | ORRINGER Lottie | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 100 | YUAN Agnes | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 101 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 102 | HU Sophie | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 103 | SHIN Jaelynn | 100% | 64% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 104 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 6% | |
| 105 | DONG Angela | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 106 | ALKADI Mai | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | GE Lena Lan | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | IQBAL Mariam | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 110 | LEE Jeemin | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 111 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 66% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 112 | DONG Emily | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 113 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | LI Olivia | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 115 | SONG Erin | 100% | 80% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 117 | FAN Lydia | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 118 | SAH Madeleine | 100% | 63% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 119 | CHANG Janelle | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 120 | CAMPBELL June | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 121 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 122 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 123 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 124 | CHOI Jordan | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | MORSE Katherine | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.