Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAN Elisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 2 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | LAU Sydnee M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 3 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 5 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 6 | TONG Ophelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 7 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 8 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 9 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 10 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 11 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | |
| 12 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Angelin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | HOLMGREN Tegan L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | WANG Catherine K. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 18 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | WADHWANI Liana A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | KIM Alyssa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | WU Kyra | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 25 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 26 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 27 | KIM Kayla A. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | RAMAN Tanvi | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | LAI Annika | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 32 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 34 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 35 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 36 | SZEGO Clara M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 37 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | FAN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 39 | LIN Joyce | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 40 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 41 | CHEN Cynthia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 42 | DUMAINE Matilda J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | YANG Blanche | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KUMAR Anmol | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 47 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YANKOPOULOS Alexis | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | HOBSON Leena | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | MULLENEX Laura | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LI Angela | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.