Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
2 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
3 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% |
3 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
5 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
6 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
7 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
8 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
9 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
10 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% |
11 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
12 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
13 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
14 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
16 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
18 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 5% |
19 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
20 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
21 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
22 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
23 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 3% |
24 | WU Cici | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
25 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
26 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
27 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
28 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 4% |
29 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - |
30 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
31 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
32 | SU Emma | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
34 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
35 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
36 | FAY Zoe A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
37 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | NI Sharon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
39 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
41 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
42 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
43 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
44 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
45 | IQBAL Sulphia | 100% | 95% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
46 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 78% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
48 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
49 | ILYIN Anna | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
51 | CHIANG Sydney | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CHU Laura | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
53 | GOEL Ishita | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
54 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
55 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
56 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
57 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
61 | CHINTA Ritika | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.