Rockaway, NJ - Rockaway, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 2 | LIN John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 3 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 5 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 6 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 9% |
| 7 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 9 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 11 | MESHKOV Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 12 | YANG Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 13 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 24% |
| 14 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 15 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 16 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
| 18 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 19 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 13% | |
| 20 | PEDERSEN Leif | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 21 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 22 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 23 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
| 24 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 25 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 28 | RYAN Edward T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 96% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 5% | |
| 34 | LIU kelly | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 4% | |
| 35 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | ATEFI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 3% | |
| 37 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 39 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 40 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | TANG Albert | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 45 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | COOK Aidan J. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | OCHOA-ANDERSEN Pablo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 52 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | HUANG Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 54 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | SHAO Peter | 100% | 95% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 57 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 59 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 60 | PEARSON James G. | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 63 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 64 | LO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 65 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 93% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | BELEV Nicholas | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | GINSBURG Daniel | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 70 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | KULKARNI Rohan | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | PILAT Matthew J. | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.