Morris Cup RYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 59%
2 LI Arvin 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
3 TANG Albert 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40%
3 MOHAMED Murad 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60%
5 LU Andy 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 3%
6 FENG Michael 100% 100% 99% 89% 54% 14%
7 AKYAMAC Bora 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
8 JIANG Bowang 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 16% 2%
9 MOHAMED Amir 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
10 KONG Luculentus X. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
11 SIMONOV Timofey 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 43% 7%
12 HAN Changhee 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 34%
13 ARCE Andrew W. 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 2%
14 CHO Jadon Yushin 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 30%
15 CHEN Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 16%
16 CHEN Hanson 100% 100% 100% 95% 70% 26%
17 YAO Bradley 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 15%
18 HOLLIS Sean 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 11% 1%
19 MAO Lucas 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 23%
20 PITERBARG Maxim 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 6%
21 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 15%
22 TANG Alexander L. 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 16%
23 JURMAN Therin 100% 100% 96% 79% 41% 10% 1%
24 MILLER Jordan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 14%
25 SHANNON Jack 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 12% 2%
26 HART-SYED declan 100% 82% 40% 9% 1% -
27 KLYCZEK Andrew 100% 99% 93% 68% 30% 6%
28 BAI Brian 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 49% 9%
29 WANG Rory 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 13%
30 WONG Jacob W. 100% 98% 87% 56% 21% 3% -
31 POLONI Giovanni 100% 96% 76% 38% 10% 1%
32 SONG Noel 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
33 ZHANG GAVIN J 100% 97% 77% 41% 12% 2% -
34 BELCHAMBER Mason 100% 97% 80% 44% 14% 2% -
35 ZHEN Ethan 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 17%
36 HUANG Chenghan 100% 94% 65% 27% 6% 1% -
37 GAO Andrew 100% 99% 83% 34% 6% - -
38 ORLOV Dmitriy 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 7%
39 MARISI Gabriel 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7% -
39 LIM Charlie 100% 100% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
39 SURESH Rohan 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
42 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
43 JIMENEZ Naveen 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 32% 4%
44 LEE Charles T 100% 95% 69% 28% 5% -
45 MARTIN Mason 100% 100% 98% 81% 35% 7% -
46 MILLER Dillon 100% 100% 97% 81% 50% 18% 3%
46 ZOU Michael 100% 87% 48% 14% 2% - -
48 YU Stephen 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 4% -
49 CAO Justin 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
50 YEVDAYEV Tamir Yevdayev 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
51 ABRAMSOHN Seth 100% 81% 41% 11% 1% -
52 TANG August L. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 20%
53 SUN Henry 100% 87% 49% 13% 2% -
54 LEVY Jacob 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
55 SICAT Justin 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3% -
56 WEST Nathaniel 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
57 POWELL Sean 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% - -
58 XIE Jicheng 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
59 CHA James 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% -
60 LI Ayren 100% 100% 95% 73% 32% 6%
61 BAKSHI Aman 100% 86% 47% 12% 1% -
62 DA SILVA Jamie 100% 70% 25% 4% - -
63 SOBON Jason 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
64 JIN Andy 100% 96% 78% 42% 13% 2% -
65 NICOLL William 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 7% -
66 KRECKE Gareth 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
67 SION Andrew 100% 95% 70% 30% 6% 1% -
68 KOVACS Harrison 100% 62% 21% 4% - - -
68 CHINN Callum 100% 71% 29% 7% 1% - -
70 PECK Quinn 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 5% -
71 XU Brian 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
72 MCCARTHY Hudson 100% 86% 29% 4% - - -
73 BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 3% -
74 WOODCOCK Henry 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
75 DIAZ Gabriel 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
76 ALLEN DJ 100% 68% 23% 3% - -
77 CHUN Zachary 100% 64% 20% 3% - - -
78 CHANDRAMOHAN Aran 100% 89% 53% 19% 4% - -
79 PEREZ Logan 100% 61% 20% 3% - - -
79 TAPLIN Aaron 100% 52% 13% 2% - - -
81 CHUN Alexander 100% 30% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.