Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG YIRAN | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 73% | |
| 2 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 57% |
| 3 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 3 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 5 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 20% | |
| 6 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 51% |
| 7 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 2% | 28% | 70% | |
| 8 | LIU Enjia Sherry liu | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 9 | WANG Carol | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 10 | SAKALLA Serene | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
| 12 | LI Eleanor | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | |
| 13 | GE Yu Ming | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 52% | 22% |
| 14 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 48% | 8% | |
| 16 | HAO Danica | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 17 | KIM Claire | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | FIELD Julianna | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 49% | 15% |
| 19 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
| 20 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 8% | 33% | 43% | 15% | 1% | |
| 21 | SHENG Katherine | - | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 39% | 8% |
| 22 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 25 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 26 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
| 27 | BADLANI Diya | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | BING Charlotte | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | HARRIS Julia | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 30 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 1% | 11% | 43% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | OLAWOYE Jadesola | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Amabel | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 33 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 2% | 22% | 60% | 16% | |
| 34 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 33% | 5% |
| 35 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 36 | HUANG Sophie | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | XIE Lillian | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 38 | LIN Yunong | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SHIN Elizabeth | 1% | 14% | 48% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | LI Katerina | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 42 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | KRAHE Annika | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | BO Iris | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | WANG Dina C. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 47 | SHUTZER Lily | 9% | 54% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | YIN Chloe | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 49 | LEO Jenna | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | LAZAR Carolina | 1% | 12% | 49% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 51 | SHANG Arianna | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Savannah | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | WAN Celine | 42% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | JIANG Chloe | - | 7% | 37% | 46% | 10% | - | |
| 55 | CHOI Cara | 50% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SFINTESCU Emma | 35% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | MANGLANI Maya | 43% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | CAO Amelie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 59 | CHUNG Stella | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | YANG Hanli | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | EYER Brooke | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | PARK Alexandria | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | POLING Katherine | 27% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 64 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 65 | LEE Allison | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | SHAH Mahi | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 32% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LIU Caydence | 20% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 69 | PARK Emily | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | GOODMAN Carden | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | JUVVADI Aanika | 51% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.