Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
2 | MULLER Inara | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% |
3 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
3 | LI Tiffany | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
5 | HU Alicia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
6 | KATZ Emma | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
7 | PEREIRA Izumi | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | < 1% |
8 | MAK Jayden | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
9 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
10 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
11 | WANG MONA | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
12 | LEE Elise | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
13 | WANG Chloe | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
14 | ZHANG Nikki | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
15 | MOFFITT Charlotte | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
16 | DANIELS Jordanna | 1% | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
17 | XU Elaine | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 39% |
18 | FONG Zoe | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
19 | JOHN Sophia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
20 | ZHANG Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
21 | LAU Angela | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
22 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
22 | MAGITSKY Giadora | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
24 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
25 | WILLER Anna | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 2% |
26 | MENON Maya | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
27 | FREY Elise | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
28 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
29 | MALUKI Nia | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
29 | GU Allison | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
31 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
32 | LIAO Amber | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | CHEN Chloe | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
34 | MULHERN Eleanor | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
35 | WU Harper | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
36 | ALPEROVICH Madeline | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
37 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | MEINING CHLOE | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
39 | SMITH Genevieve | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
40 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
41 | BINSHTOK Ariana | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | WU Jing | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
43 | POTDAR Harper | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | VARAH Alaia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
45 | YI Victoria | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
45 | SHTEYMAN Simone | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | CHANG Grace | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
47 | JOSEPH Azalée | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
49 | AN Jasmine | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
50 | CHANG Daisy | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
51 | ONG Katherine | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
52 | MADDISON Estelle | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
53 | KONDE Anika | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
54 | PALACIOS Sophia | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
55 | TOM Danielle | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
56 | PURITZ Morgan | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.