Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
2 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
3 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
3 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% |
5 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% | 2% |
6 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
7 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
8 | LI Michael | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
9 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
10 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
11 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
12 | MOGUNOV Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 13% |
13 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
14 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
15 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
16 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
18 | ARTETA-CHEVALIER Ulysse | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
19 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
20 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 2% | |
20 | BURCH III Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
22 | PARK Sean | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
23 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
24 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
25 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
26 | RISMAN Edward | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
27 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | 3% |
28 | YI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
29 | ZHAO Owen | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
31 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
32 | LI Lucas | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
34 | BLAIR Campbell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
35 | HU Simon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
36 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
37 | WU Vincent | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
38 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
38 | LIU Caleb | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
40 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
41 | BRADY Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
42 | MAKLIN David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
43 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
44 | GARCIA-ALBEA Diego | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
45 | HENDERSON Louis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% | |
46 | SZETO Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
47 | SIVUK arda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
48 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
49 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 3% |
50 | MITHUN Prabal | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
51 | LEISTNER Armin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
52 | ZHAO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% | |
53 | LLOYD Max | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
54 | DAI Ethan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
55 | SCHWARTZMAN Jakub | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
56 | PARK Layne | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
57 | SUH Jordan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
58 | PATEL Rohan | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
59 | BALBALE Zayd | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
60 | ZHANG Weihang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
61 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
62 | SHEYNZON David | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
63 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
64 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
65 | SONG Jerry | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
66 | GAW Zachary | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
67 | FAZELINIA Erfaan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
68 | LI Kent | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
69 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
70 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
70 | GAO Francis | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | ABADIR james | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
73 | GARCIA-ALBEA Oscar | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
74 | LEE Jeffrey | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
75 | ZHERENOVSKY Alan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
76 | KRISHNARASA Aiyann | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
77 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
78 | LI Felix | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
79 | BURNS Carson | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
80 | LEE Weston | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
81 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
81 | SEDAKA Dylan | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
83 | LEE Davis | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
84 | SINHA Nalin | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | KHARAWALA Raj | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
86 | KATZ Isaac | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
87 | SONG William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
88 | CHEN Joshua | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
89 | KULJIEV Boyan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
90 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
90 | GAW Christian | 100% | 90% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
92 | BOROFF Gideon | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
93 | KOWALIK III Edward | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.