Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 2 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 3 | LU Tiffany J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | NISHIMURA Madeleine A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 5 | YEH Samantha | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 6 | PARK Rowan M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
| 7 | TAN Elisha | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% |
| 8 | QIAN Crystal | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 13% | |
| 9 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 10 | COLA Emmanuelle (Emma) R. | - | 2% | 21% | 46% | 26% | 4% | |
| 11 | BRONDUM Alexandra L. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | JO Mia C. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | SOOD Ishani S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 14 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 15 | TRAN Ava D. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
| 16 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 17 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% |
| 18 | WU Kyra | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
| 19 | CHOI Lenna K. | - | 7% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | LAU Sydnee M. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 44% | 16% | |
| 21 | DUAN Konnie | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | WANG Christine | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% |
| 24 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | IBEN Claire L. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 26 | TONG Ophelia | - | - | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 27 | CHENG Lydia A. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 28 | TAN Clarisse | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KANG Jiyoon | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CAO Arianna L. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 31 | YANG Blanche | 12% | 46% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | SHIH Diane | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WANG Catherine K. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | SZEGO Clara M. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 38 | KIM Alyssa | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
| 39 | YEH Marissa E. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 4% | 40% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | LEE Angelin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ALTEN Ayaka | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LEE Isabelle | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 44 | VOHRA Anusha | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
| 46 | RAMAN Tanvi | 5% | 42% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 48 | FAN Elaine | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | KUMAR Anmol | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 52 | LAI Annika | 4% | 26% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | LI Angela | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | CHO Taylor S. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 55 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | YANKOPOULOS Alexis | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 20% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MULLENEX Laura | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HOBSON Leena | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | YOUNG Audrey | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | DUMAINE Matilda J. | 10% | 54% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 62 | LIN Joyce | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHEN Cynthia | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | SU Alysa J. | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 65 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.