Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
2 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
3 | LU Tiffany J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | NISHIMURA Madeleine A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
5 | YEH Samantha | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
6 | PARK Rowan M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
7 | TAN Elisha | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% |
8 | QIAN Crystal | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 13% | |
9 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
10 | COLA Emmanuelle (Emma) R. | - | 2% | 21% | 46% | 26% | 4% | |
11 | BRONDUM Alexandra L. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
12 | JO Mia C. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
13 | SOOD Ishani S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
14 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
15 | TRAN Ava D. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
16 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
17 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% |
18 | WU Kyra | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
19 | CHOI Lenna K. | - | 7% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
20 | LAU Sydnee M. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 44% | 16% | |
21 | DUAN Konnie | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
22 | WANG Christine | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
23 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% |
24 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
25 | IBEN Claire L. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
26 | TONG Ophelia | - | - | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
27 | CHENG Lydia A. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
28 | TAN Clarisse | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
29 | KANG Jiyoon | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
30 | CAO Arianna L. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
31 | YANG Blanche | 12% | 46% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | SHIH Diane | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | WANG Catherine K. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
34 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
35 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
36 | SZEGO Clara M. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
38 | KIM Alyssa | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
39 | YEH Marissa E. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
40 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 4% | 40% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
41 | LEE Angelin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
42 | ALTEN Ayaka | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
43 | LEE Isabelle | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
44 | VOHRA Anusha | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
45 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
46 | RAMAN Tanvi | 5% | 42% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
47 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
48 | FAN Elaine | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
49 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
50 | KUMAR Anmol | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
52 | LAI Annika | 4% | 26% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | |
53 | LI Angela | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | CHO Taylor S. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
55 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
56 | YANKOPOULOS Alexis | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
57 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 20% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | MULLENEX Laura | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
59 | HOBSON Leena | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
60 | YOUNG Audrey | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
61 | DUMAINE Matilda J. | 10% | 54% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
62 | LIN Joyce | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
63 | CHEN Cynthia | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
64 | SU Alysa J. | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
65 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.