Morris Cup RYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Saber

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GONG Alex 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
2 VAROQUA Nalby 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
3 PEREIRA Beckham 100% 99% 91% 69% 36% 11% 1%
3 SUBA Lucas 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 24%
5 TSAO Oliver 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 30%
6 HUANG Alex F. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
7 BROENING-CHAI Jonas 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 25% 2%
8 AYDOGDU Hakan 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
9 MANESCU Miron 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 25% 4%
10 WANG Junyu 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
11 BIVIJI Ali 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 14%
12 CIEMINS Henry 100% 99% 90% 60% 22% 3%
13 CHEN Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
14 FIROOZI Sam 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% -
15 HENDERSON Lucas 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 5%
16 ZHANG Ray 100% 97% 80% 48% 18% 4% -
17 RIDKY Sam 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 4%
18 SAVOY Luca 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
19 SALDARINI Glenn 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 15% 2%
20 KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen 100% 99% 90% 61% 22% 3%
21 MCDONALD Finn 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
22 ALAVE Kyle 100% 100% 98% 86% 51% 13%
23 SADHU Neiyam 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 32% 5%
24 JONES Elijah 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 1%
25 DOMINIQUE Remson 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
26 DUMOULIN Gabriel 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 41%
27 BADUSHOV Anton 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
28 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 6%
29 DIMATTEO Michael 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 2%
30 KUMAR Arjun 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
31 BOULAIS Andrew D. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 41% 7%
32 MARKARYAN Eric 100% 97% 80% 47% 18% 4% -
33 KIARA Kinoti 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
34 YOSHEA Henry 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 8% 1%
35 POWER Alex 100% 100% 94% 70% 30% 5%
36 WEI William 100% 98% 86% 55% 23% 5% -
37 WU Timothy 100% 99% 93% 72% 40% 13% 2%
38 SHEYNZON Benjamin 100% 92% 62% 25% 5% - -
39 SHIPITSIN Alexander 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 23%
40 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 100% 99% 84% 48% 14% 2%
41 KETT Richard 100% 96% 73% 35% 8% 1%
42 PORTER Dupree 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
43 TSAO Alister 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
44 ZHENG LEON 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 9%
45 AROUNA Ilan 100% 99% 92% 71% 38% 12% 2%
46 JI Johnson 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 11% 1%
47 KENNEDY Tomás 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 2% -
48 BODKIN Jake M. 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
49 LAZARTE Gabriel 100% 95% 73% 36% 9% 1% -
50 WITCZAK Mateus 100% 100% 96% 82% 53% 21% 4%
51 DESAUTELS Connor 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 7%
52 ROSADO Sebastian 100% 95% 70% 31% 6% -
53 RAJMOHAN Arya 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
54 JAIN Karanvir 100% 87% 55% 22% 5% 1% -
55 EKONG-REID Severian 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
56 LIU Andrew 100% 98% 84% 50% 18% 3% -
57 BERGER Jacob 100% 97% 83% 53% 22% 5% -
57 AMAGOWNI Dhruv 100% 81% 43% 14% 2% - -
59 HAUSLER Jayden 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
60 HO Nathaniel 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1%
61 DEELY Hartigan 100% 95% 68% 29% 6% 1%
62 SARWAHI Viraat 100% 97% 79% 45% 16% 3% -
63 GREENE Kevin 100% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1%
64 JARAMILLO Juan 100% 88% 50% 16% 3% - -
65 ORTHMANN Tristin 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 12%
66 JIANG Terence 100% 81% 39% 9% 1% -
67 REILLY Xavier 100% 70% 28% 6% 1% - -
68 QUAIL Jonathan 100% 92% 54% 17% 3% -
69 YANG Byron 100% 59% 18% 3% - -
70 GAO Kai 100% 66% 25% 6% 1% - -
71 CHANG Timothy 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
72 WASCO Andrew 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
73 KRAYTMAN Matthew 100% 73% 32% 8% 1% - -
74 WOLMART Zander 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
75 NAJI Ethan 100% 96% 77% 45% 17% 4% -
76 STEWART Samuel 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
77 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 100% 57% 18% 3% - - -
78 BRADBURY Noah 100% 77% 35% 8% 1% -
79 JANUS Maksymilian 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
80 LAVERDE Nick 100% 43% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.