John T Rhodes Sport Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% | |
2 | SLOUGH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
3 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
3 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
5 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
6 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
7 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
8 | DAVIS Kelly | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
9 | NORWOOD Malik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
10 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
11 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
12 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
13 | PENG Yue | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
14 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
15 | O'DEA Ryan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
16 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
17 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
18 | RUSSELL Tallis | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
19 | PERLENFEIN Tyler J. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
20 | STEPANIAN George | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
21 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
22 | TAURMAN Jr. Patrick J. | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | SEEDS Aidan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | KARNAVAS William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.