Sandy Springs, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIN Kason Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | SARSOUR Ghaleb Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | SOARES Manuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | AMER Jamal Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | TAM Ethan | V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 6 | MUNAGAPATI Vishwa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | ZHANG Eric Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | FAN Yuchen | D | V | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 9 | OLSON Ray Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | JIANG Harry | V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 11 | SORANNO James | V | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 12 | NEWTON Quinn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | VANDER VELDE Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | MAYO Candler | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 15 | PETE Landon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | WILCOX Hoke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | ERIZE Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | HUNTLEY JJ Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | WISE Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | KHAN Ahmed Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | ANSLEY Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | XHEMALI Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | SUGGS Malik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | BEDULLA Asher | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 25 | MURO Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | POLLACK Hudson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | RAGLAND Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | OLDHAM Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | KIM William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | LOEGEL Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | TAYLOR Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | ORENSTEIN Zayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | LANDREY Ashton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | DIEKER Edwin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | SONG Apolo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | VELAZQUEZ Ethan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | PARRADO Harrison Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | GUY Austin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | HADDAD Rossin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | CARNEY Jameson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | STALEMARK Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | KUMAR Nithin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | AZUA DJ Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | WALLEY Jordan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | MANNA Eshaan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | HAERI Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | HAERI Jonathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | LEWIS Frederick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | MENDEZ-SILVA Matias Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | PURSER John Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | URBANAWIZ Aaron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | CAMPBELL Kamau Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | CHOI Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | GEBELEIN Will Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | WU Jeremy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | GILL Santiago Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | OCCHIALINI Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | BEASLEY Bryson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | SNIDER Bodhi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | WILLIAMS Stevie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | BREED Freddie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | MISHRA Pranjal Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | ARBOLEDA Thadeo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | COOPER Rory Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | KRAMER Philip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | CHOW Aaron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | IBRAHIM Mehdi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | LEUDER Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | MILLER Liam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.