ChimeLong Tourist Resort Area Convention/Conference Center - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANTONG chen | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 2 | CHENG Bob | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 3 | TSE Ngon Yin Anson | - | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 3 | XIA Yimiao | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 5 | TAN Junghyun | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 6 | YE Neilson | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 7 | HE Haoxuan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 8 | MENG Fanlu | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | |
| 9 | ZHOU Jingxiong | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 10 | LEE JISUNG | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 11 | SO GERALD | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 12 | FANG JIA YI | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 44% | |
| 13 | LI ZONGLIN | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | LEONG Chit Seong | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 15 | HUANG Holmes (Shengheng) | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 16 | ZHOU Xiaowei | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 17 | JUNYU BAO | - | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | LEE SIYUN | 1% | 9% | 35% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | KIM Seojun | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 20 | LEE seungje | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 19% | |
| 21 | FU Shihshan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 22 | GONG Nigel | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | NA James Eunchan | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 24 | LEE Aiden Yunhyung | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 25 | HA JUWON | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
| 26 | TSANG PADDY | 1% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | HUANG Junhang | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 28 | WAN Pak Kiu Carson | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 29 | YOON Byungheon | - | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | LEE Yun | - | 2% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 4% | |
| 31 | KO Cheuk Yip | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | SEO Juwan | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | HO Evan Isaiah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 46% | 5% |
| 34 | LAI baiheng | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 35 | MANKOWSKI Elliott | 1% | 9% | 35% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | HUO Aaron Yunting | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 37 | LI Xingmo | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 25% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Mason Gunhyung | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 40 | CHEN Zourui | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | PALAFOX Lucas | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% | |
| 42 | GUAN Greg | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 43 | CHONG Jun Yu Aaron | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 44 | HAN JIAYI | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 45 | XIA Philip | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | GUO Jiaxi | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | HA Varick | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | LIN Travis | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | YUE zhonghan | 4% | 34% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | SUSANTO William | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 51 | LEE Vincent | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | ROLDAN Yohann Malik | 32% | 43% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | CHU Zai Lim Zenthus | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | SONG HAN GYEOL | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | PARK JUSTIN SEOJUN | 5% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | HUANG YuCheng | 12% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | SEO Juhyeok | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | GAO VICTOR | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | LIN Enjun | 4% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | LIU George | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | WANG Yanzhi | 11% | 50% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 62 | WANG George | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | CHEN ERIC | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 64 | HU Carlos | 2% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | HE Lucas | 2% | 54% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.