Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO julie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
| 2 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 3 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 5 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 17% |
| 5 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 8 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | LAURI Keira | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | DONG Angel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 11 | SO Catelyn | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 12 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 13 | DHAR Rana | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | FAN Alexandria | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 15 | ZENG Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 16 | GAY Sasha | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 18 | MALEK Zolie | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | DANG Kelia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | LIN Nicole | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 21 | GUVEN Coco | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 22 | CASTELO Soleil | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 24 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 24 | BERMAN greta | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | LI Sonia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
| 29 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | LOMOTAN Addison | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | TENG EMMA | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 32 | WALLER London | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 33 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | MACKAY Katherine | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | FAVO Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 36 | TAN Adelyn | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 37 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 38 | LEOU Korina | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | WANG Jiayi | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | LIU kai yin aria | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 41 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 42 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 44 | LIU Sydney | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 45 | HUANG Doris | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KIM Satie | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | DANTULURI Shalini | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 48 | YU Holly | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 49 | XIE Nora | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | WEI JoyAnn | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 51 | ZOLLER Noelle | 6% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 52 | SHI Julia | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 53 | LEE Alyson | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 54 | CHAN Jolene | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 54 | AWAD Royce | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | DHAR Layla | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 57 | TONG Laurie | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 59 | ARNOLD Hali | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | CHUNG Hailey | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 61 | DIECK Miranda P. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 62 | TSE Angelina | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 63 | GENTILE Vittoria | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | LIU Hannah | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 65 | CROOKS Riley | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 66 | CHEN Elaine | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 67 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 68 | MUNGUIA Mila | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 69 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 69 | KIM Saeren | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | LIM Jaslene | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 72 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 72 | BROWN Aria | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 74 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 75 | CONG Anne | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | KINKADE Ellie | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 77 | OCA Merci | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 79 | MUND Ruth | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 80 | PADANILAM Lily | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 81 | KANG Ellie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | WANG Callie | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 83 | WONG Natalie | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 84 | STONE Coral | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 85 | HSU Leah | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 85 | PABIAN Emilia | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 87 | LUKER Hannah | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 88 | YAM Danika | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 88 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 90 | KWON Ava | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 92 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 93 | YUEN Nicole | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 94 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 95 | ZHU Avril | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 96 | LIU Kelly | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 97 | SHEARER Alena | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 98 | DUDNICK Morgan | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 99 | WANG Emily | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | LIN Elaine | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 101 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | KU Chloe | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 103 | LIU Hannah | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | TANG Zhifei | < 1% | 2% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 105 | CHAVAN Arya | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 106 | KRASOWSKA Gabriela | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | CHAN Isla | 63% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 107 | KRASOWSKA Nadia | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.