New Tournament

Div II Mixed Saber

Saturday, January 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Beaverton, OR, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 ST.CLAIRE-KING Tenzin 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 17% 2%
2 DESSAUER Tobyn M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 14%
3 DOLEV Ido 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73% 17%
3 DOLEV Rony 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 3%
5 KINKADE Ellie 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 12%
6 ZHANG Lucas 100% 100% 95% 78% 46% 16% 3% -
7 CALL Henderson 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 15% 3% -
8 SULLIVAN Gerard 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4% -
9 FERRIS JR. Michael 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
10 NORVAL Ryan J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 12%
11 LEMMEN Jasmijn 100% 100% 100% 94% 74% 38% 10% 1%
12 WILLEMSE Jamie 100% 100% 98% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
13 ORTIZ Baltazar 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 45% 16% 2%
14 KNISER Tim 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 6%
15 KELLEHER Liam 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% - -
16 TEE Benjamin 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
17 LIEBISCH Milo 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3% - -
18 FISH Wade 100% 99% 93% 73% 40% 13% 2% -
19 MCCORMICK Karley 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 13% 1% -
20 CALDWELL Jason 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 31% 4% -
21 LEE Andrew 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% - -
22 STEPKA Mikolaj 100% 95% 71% 34% 8% 1% -
23 KANG Alan 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 5% 1% -
24 ERPELDING Emily 100% 96% 80% 51% 23% 7% 1% -
25 GUVEN Can 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 13% 2% -
26 HAYES Ezra 100% 97% 78% 43% 13% 2% - -
27 SMITH Etienne 100% 86% 47% 14% 2% - - -
28 KAPLAN Zev 100% 100% 97% 84% 56% 23% 5% -
29 SULLIVAN Clara 100% 87% 53% 19% 4% - - -
30 GIBSON Zel 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 11% 1%
31 BARRETT Maya 100% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.