Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | AMELI Sean | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | MOREAU John A. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | RANES Evan | V D V D D | V V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 5 | RICHARDS Dick | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | VARNEY John R. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | SEGAL Mark N. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | WHEELER Mark C. | V D D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | ALEXANDER Chuck | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | GLASS Timothy C. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | HENZLER Thomas A. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | SMITH Herman E. | D D D V D | V V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 17 | WALLACE Patric | D V V V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | SCOTT George R. | V V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | KAROLAK Dale W. | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 22 | EVANS Allen L. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | KING Charles M. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 24 | BAER Bryan G. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 25 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | MARIANI Lou | V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | D D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | MASE James B. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | LIMA Roberto M. | V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | HENDRICKS Ron | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 32 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | WAGMAN Robert S. | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 34 | NEALE James H. | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | D V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 37 | RESS Michael A. | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 39 | ABELE Chris | D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 40 | TKACH Robert W. | D V D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 41 | SNYDER John W. | V D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 42 | TIERNEY Luke | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 44 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 45 | HERMAN Ronald J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 46 | KLEIN Johannes | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 47 | SCHULZ Andrew | D D D D D V | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 48 | HVIDING Ketil | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 49 | MYERS Brent M. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 50 | GRAVIS Martin V. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | LOGAN Mark P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 52 | WHITE Chance N. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 53 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.