Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | RUI Jessie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 3 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% | |
| 3 | YAO abby | - | - | - | 4% | 39% | 57% | |
| 5 | PARK Lauren | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 38% | |
| 6 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 45% | |
| 7 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 8 | LIU Ashley | - | - | 8% | 37% | 41% | 14% | |
| 9 | LIM Kensie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 47% | 17% |
| 10 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 11 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | 1% | 15% | 57% | 27% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Viviana | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 13 | LI Annabelle | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | CHUNG Katie | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 16 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% | |
| 17 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | DENG Claire | - | - | 1% | 14% | 52% | 33% | |
| 19 | TU Averie | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 38% | 4% | |
| 20 | YANG Grace | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 21 | SAIFEE Sakina | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHEN bridgette | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | YUNG Zoe | 2% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | GOWDA Siyona | 2% | 16% | 40% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | FAN Lauren | 4% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | DEJOY Leilah | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | WANG Doreen | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 27 | NICOLETTI Thea | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LIN Clara | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SAIFEE Zahra | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 31 | CHEN Summer | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | KIM Ines | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DONG Nancy | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | SANTIAGO Rania | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | CHO Rylee | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | KIM Phoebe | 22% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | POEI Meagan | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | CHEN Catherine | 14% | 44% | 34% | 8% | - | - | |
| 39 | FU Joy | 11% | 49% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 40 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 17% | 43% | 32% | 8% | - | - | |
| 41 | DAM Sofi | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHAN Catherine | 1% | 9% | 35% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | LIU Celia | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | LIM Kora | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | YANG Claire | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | POON Taylor | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | PARK Seojeong | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 22% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | PEROJO Angie | < 1% | 4% | 24% | 46% | 24% | 2% | |
| 50 | DESAI Zoya | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 51 | FU Angela | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | CAO Alexandra | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CHEN Arielle | < 1% | 1% | 14% | 41% | 37% | 6% | |
| 54 | KIM Chloe | 29% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | ZEE Bella | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LEI Yifei Faye | 43% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | DAVIS Gia | < 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.