UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | VIVEROS Evan | V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | SHAJI Karthik | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | HARKINS Craig T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | WANG Sophia | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 5 | LI Sophia M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | SHEHORN Connor | D V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 9 | MILLER Jonah | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | ERBEN Samuel | V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | CAO Kellen | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | CHEN Kuan-Ting | V V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | RILEY Owen | V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 15 | WATERS Samantha M. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | HARKINS Asher | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | YOU Chanmin | V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | OLSON Clayton M. | V V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | ZHOU Alex | D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | OH Seonghun | V V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | CAGLE Robert | D V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 23 | MCNEW Declan | V D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | MADDOX Lacey E. | V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 25 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | D D D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 27 | ALLEN Charles | D D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | BLACK Elias | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 29 | WHITE Kevin | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | FIFTAL Grayson | D D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 31 | CARDINAL Elise | D D D V D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 32 | LE BLANC Anna | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | ANDUJAR Gerardo | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 34 | WONG Charles | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | NAM David | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 36 | COPE Wilson | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 37 | RIDLEY Mary Emma | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 38 | HINTON-LAWSON Deva | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | BROWN Mahalie | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.