Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | CAO Oliver | V V D V V D | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | ANDRES Michael | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | KOVACHEV Martin | D V V D D D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 5 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | ROSALES Vincent | V V V V V D | V V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 7 | GU Kevin | V V V V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 8 | KANG Evan | D V D D V D | V V V D | 5.2 | 2 | -3.2 |
| 9 | ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) | V V D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | CHAN Aidan | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | XIAO Brayden | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | LI Yidong A. | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | TANI Tino | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | SU Kingston | D V D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | CHEN Cooper | V D V D D V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | WEINBERG Harry | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | V V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 18 | CHOW William T. | V V V V V D | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | COBIAN Richard | V V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 20 | ZENG Vito | V V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 21 | GREMILLION Obadiah | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 21 | LI AYDEN | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 23 | WANG Tiger | V V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 24 | SUNG Julian | V V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 25 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 26 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | V D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | HONG Arick | D D V V V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 28 | HONG Aidan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | TUNG Ryan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 30 | KIM Ryan | V D D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 31 | LEE Brian | D D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 32 | LEE Brandon | D D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | YANG Phillip | V D D V V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 34 | WANG HongXi | D D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 35 | CAO Donald | V V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 35 | WINTERSET Mason | V V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 37 | FRENCILLO Daryl | D V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 38 | LEIGH Edward | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 39 | KULKARNI Shreyas | V D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 40 | LIU Daniel | V D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 41 | SINGHAL Armaan | D V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 42 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | D D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | CHI Everett | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 44 | HENRY Ethan | V D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 45 | BUI Joseph | V V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 46 | VOSPER James | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 47 | TIAN Zimo | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 48 | SEELMAN Cole | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 48 | LIAO Yifong | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 50 | VO Landon | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 51 | LI linze | D D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 52 | LIU Yijin | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 53 | LIU Ziyi | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 54 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 55 | KATZ Nico | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 56 | HWANG Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.