Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SMITH Chaz V. | V D V D V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 2 | DENNER Jasmina | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | KIM Nam Heui | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 3 | PERNICE Robin J. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 5 | YANG Jenny J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | WILKERSON Mary B. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 7 | ALTMAN Leigh | V D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 8 | THORNTON Eva | D D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 9 | OBLONSKY Natalia | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | WILSON Dawn J. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 12 | FOLEY Eileen | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 13 | ENOCHS Liz | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | LAPP Laurie E. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 15 | DREYER Nadia S. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | WU Yik Chun | D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 17 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | D V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | JERKINS Jayne A. | V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 19 | MAUL Judy L. | D V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 20 | GIULIANO Anne | V D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | D V D D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 22 | DEGEN Anita L. | D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 23 | FELDMAN Jill A. | V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | KING Robin E. | D V D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 25 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 27 | WALTER Joanne | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 28 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | GOMES Gisela | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 30 | IIZUKA Sawako | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | WEBB Maud | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | WILLEMSE Jamie | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | DUDLEY Gayle | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.