Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DARRICAU Henri J. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | GROSS Stephen R. | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | STREB Joseph S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | HENDRICKS Ron | V V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 7 | CRACRAFT William J. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 8 | BENNETT Philippe | V D D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 9 | PAVLOVICH Robert | V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 10 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 11 | KLEIN Johannes | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 13 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | STURGIS Bruce T. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | DRAKE David L. | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 16 | KEENEY Jeff | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | WASHINGTON Romeo S. | V V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | LIM Richard M. | V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 20 | WILBERT Matt | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | JOHANSON David B. | V D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | MARIANI Lou | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | TIERNEY Luke | V D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 26 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | ZEISS Gary M. | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 29 | RESS Michael A. | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | D D D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 31 | DANS Alan | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | KIRSHNER Ronald | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | BLAIR III Ray H. | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | CROSTHWAITE John T. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 36 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 37 | ACKER Alan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.