Event Results
Icicle InvitationalDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BUCKINGHAM Emma N. | V V V D V | V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 2 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | LYTLE Darby | V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 3 | LEBRUSKA Makayla | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 5 | COLEMAN Kristen | D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 6 | KOVANDA Kayce | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |