Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOPYLOV Dmitri | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 47% | |
| 2 | RUNYAN Joshua | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 3 | LARA Alfred | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 34% | 7% | |
| 3 | LUNDBORG Mark R. | - | - | 2% | 22% | 49% | 27% | |
| 5 | ANTHONY Jr Donald K. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% | |
| 6 | BADGER Carlton (Carl) M. | - | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 17% | |
| 7 | MILNE Will J. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 8 | MYERS Brent M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 9 | JAKUBEK Zygmunt J. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 2% |
| 10 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 11 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 54% | 24% | |
| 12 | WILDMAN Steve | - | 2% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 3% | |
| 13 | DAHL Chris | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | LEAR Donald W. | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | HICHA Paul R. | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 37% | 11% | - |
| 16 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 2% | 19% | 49% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | PARAGANO Vincent | - | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 33% | 3% |
| 18 | WRIGHT Lloyd G. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 19 | LAUZON Thomas (Tom) A. | 2% | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 20 | TRESTMAN Robert (Bob) L. | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 20 | SRERE Mark A. | 1% | 23% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 23 | MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. | 6% | 54% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | DOBBINS James W. | 20% | 46% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 25 | SEGALE William J. | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | THORNTON Michael (Mike) G. | 53% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 28 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 21% | 55% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | YAN Peter C. | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | ACKER Alan | 25% | 53% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.