Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% | |
2 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
3 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 5% |
3 | AVRON Case B. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
5 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
6 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
7 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
8 | ASSELINEAU Joseph | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
9 | LIM Ari | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
10 | GLOVER James | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
11 | LOU Darren | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
12 | MUSHA John M. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 51% | 25% | |
13 | BARTH Gavin M. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | HSIUNG Richie | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
15 | CLAYMAN John A. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
16 | DIERKS Kian | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
17 | KIM Ian M. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
18 | YIM Alex | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
19 | GUO Hairuo | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
20 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
21 | SMITH Brandon J. | 12% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
22 | JEFFERY Jakob | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
23 | BERK Theodore | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
24 | SEAL Maximus R. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | WALL Peter M. | 6% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
26 | JIN Honggu | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
27 | NABI Masoud Masoud W. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
28 | ZHAO Jesse | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | POSTMA Sean | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | WU Clarence C. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
31 | MILLER Chance | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | JONES Bryan T. | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.