Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JACOB Lena | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 2 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 3 | WANG Ellen | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 3 | YEH Marissa E. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | RATSEP Ariel | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 6 | YE Eileen | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 7 | TONG Ophelia | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 8 | SHIH Diane | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 9 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 10 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 11 | WU Kyra | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 12 | LEE Jessica Doyun | - | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | VONA Elena M. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 14 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | HSIUNG Samantha | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | VOHRA Anusha | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | RENTON Samantha | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 19 | LUO ZIWEN | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 20 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 21 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | XIANG Emma | 6% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | SHANG Andrea | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 1% | |
| 25 | SU Michelle | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | COKER Bettina M. | - | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | CHON Sydney | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | HOBSON Leena | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 1% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 31 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 32 | BRADFORD Meeah | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Rongrui | 3% | 32% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 35 | VEERKAMP Molly | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | HOLLAND Naomi | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | YANG Alice | 8% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | OLSEN Jen | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | HAZEL Susan L. | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | BRAGG Kathleen E. | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | LIPPAI Sarah | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.