Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TANG Catherine H. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
| 2 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 3 | YODER Bridget H. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 3 | DANAHY Ellen D. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 5 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 6 | STONE Hava S. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 7 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
| 8 | KOO Samantha | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 9 | YUCEL Emine I. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 10 | SEAL Julie T. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 11 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 12 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 13 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 14 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 15 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 16 | GULATI Ria | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 17 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 19 | SHIN Andrea Y. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 20 | BAKER Audrey C. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 21 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MACARR Madalyn A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 23 | LUCHO Raisza | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 24 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 11% |
| 25 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | GEYER Carolina M. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | GLUCK Myriam | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 19% | 49% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | RAHIM Alina O. | 5% | 34% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | SUN Alyssa | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | HUNG Anna | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | DHAR Aamina | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | CHEN Grace | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DREYER Nadia S. | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | COLTER Aurora | 54% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | LEI Weixuan (Demi) | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.