Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KOCAB Elizabeth (Liz) R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
2 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% | |
3 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 25% | |
3 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
5 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
6 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
7 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
8 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
9 | SLIKAS Beth | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
10 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
11 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 2% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
12 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
13 | HURME June A. | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
14 | TELLES Anna | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
15 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
16 | MIDGLEY Janice M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
17 | LYNCH Kristin A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
18 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
19 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 15% | |
20 | CAREY Michele S. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
22 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
23 | HEINRICH Eva | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 5% | |
24 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | FREY Alison | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
26 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
27 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
28 | MCMENAMIN Dianna S. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
29 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
30 | RICH Caroline B. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
31 | MAUL Judy L. | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | |
32 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 2% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | HOFMAN Haejung | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
34 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
35 | AHER Bonnie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
36 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
37 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
38 | ROWLAND May | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
39 | BOWIE Charlotta | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
40 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
41 | HUZEL Lisa | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
42 | GROENING Joanne | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
43 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 16% | 46% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
44 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
45 | FERREIRA DA COSTA Claudia M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
46 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
47 | SIENDA Angela J. | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
48 | RUNYON Cynthia J. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
49 | RADICH Lori G. | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
50 | GROCE Linda J. | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | MASE Kerin | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
52 | RIOS Donna B. | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
53 | REAM Jann L. | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
54 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 7% | 47% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
55 | JULIEN Erica | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
56 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
57 | BROWN Trish M. | 4% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
58 | STANICA Teodora O. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.