Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAFFT Tatiana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% | |
| 2 | BENNING Friederike | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 6% | |
| 3 | BATES Cassandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 3 | RUAN Jiayi A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 5 | PROVENZA Hannah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 6 | CHRETIEN Pauline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% | |
| 7 | WADE Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
| 8 | DOUGLAS Julia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 7% | ||
| 9 | ZAFFT Sharrie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% |
| 10 | ROA RODRIGUEZ Katherine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 18% | ||
| 11 | ROBLES Elena | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | ||
| 12 | SALAZAR Susana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 13 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 14 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | SMUK Daria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | MORIN Jenna | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
| 18 | HUZEL Lisa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
| 19 | BIGGS Amelia F. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | KUNDU Anisha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 21 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | 2% | |
| 22 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | PFEIFFER Rebecca C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
| 24 | CHOI Lyla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 25 | YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% | |
| 26 | BAFFA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 17% | |
| 27 | COBERT Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 28 | BAFFA Caterina | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WICKEN Baylee S. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 31 | PARDO Sarah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | CORREA SANTA Carmen Andrea | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | MCNEILL Claire A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% |
| 35 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | PIEDRAHITA GOMEZ Alejandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 37 | DIDONATO Gianina L. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | ||
| 38 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 39 | STAVISKY Natalia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | VINE Melissa | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 42 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KANDEL Margaret C. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | LOTT Lyric O. | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | - | ||
| 46 | GANGEMI Julia | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 47 | HEINRICH Eva | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | SIDDIQUI Ammna | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | CARVALHO Maia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 50 | HUNT Nicola | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SIMON Sally R. | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | HAND Grace | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | PATEL Viha | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BANNING Grace | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | OSBORN Sabrina | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | PRICE Skye | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.