Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GU Jeffrey | - | - | - | - | 2% | 39% | 58% |
2 | CORNETT Sawyer | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 62% | 15% |
3 | STEFKO Ryan | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% | 1% |
3 | MCMANUS Liam | - | - | - | - | 2% | 27% | 71% |
5 | CAMPBELL Justin | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 28% | |
6 | FERGUSON Sam | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
8 | LIU Dylan | 12% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
9 | BAYLESS Varnum | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
10 | PENSYL Ethan | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
11 | DERRINGER Casey | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | - |
11 | KADRIC Max | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
13 | PARISH Levi | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
14 | DEVINNEY Dale | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% | - |
15 | SCOTT Ford | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
16 | RIESEN Henry | - | 2% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 6% | - |
16 | DOUGLAS Ian | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
18 | BENSON Z'quan | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | SHARKEY Liam | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
21 | ROBINSON Gabriel | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
22 | GLASS Kameron | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
23 | EDWARDS Clayton | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
24 | MARESCA Reilly | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
25 | MERINO Aidan | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | JONES Ezekiel | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
27 | GIRA Collin | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
28 | SUTTON Matthew | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.