Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIANG Emily | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 2 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 3 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Lily A. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 19% | |
| 6 | BOUTIN Alexandria | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 7 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | RAFFEL Talia M. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 9 | TRIBUSH Shayna | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | |
| 10 | CHO Adella | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | SAHNI Sophia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 12 | HURLEY Laura E. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | TURNER Emma M. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 14 | JOHNSTON Lily | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 15 | BROWN Shelby H. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 16 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 17 | PONIATOWSKI Elise | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | ZHANG Yimeng | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | - | |
| 20 | RICHARDSON Victoria | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | MILLAR Margaret | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | BOWDEN Ms Hope A. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | PETERSON Susan (Sue) T. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | AGUSTIN Claudia I. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 25 | GIPSON Camille | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.