Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORALES Jessica | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 3 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 5 | CHEN Erica | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 6 | KATZ Anat | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 7 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | NEIBART Fiona | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 9 | SHAY TANNAS Zoe | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | VALADEZ Emily T. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 12 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 13 | RHIE Lena | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 14 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | RAFFEL Talia M. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 6% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 18 | WHEELER Kira | 5% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | RITTENBERG Miriam L. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 20 | BROWN Shelby H. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | KIM Nam Heui | 12% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | TRIBUSH Shayna | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 24 | CHO Adella | 58% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GIPSON Camille | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 26 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.