Brandeis University, Gosman Sports Center - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% | |
2 | LAM Justina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 32% | |
3 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
3 | HAO Alicia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
5 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 23% | |
6 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% |
7 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
8 | CANDESCU Diana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
9 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
10 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
11 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | < 1% |
12 | GONG Christina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | |
13 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
14 | LIU Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 11% | |
15 | ZHANG Rachel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | |
16 | TAGGERSELL Cara C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
17 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | 3% |
18 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
19 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 15% |
20 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
21 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | LI Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 19% | |
23 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
24 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
25 | BALCH Julia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
26 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 5% | - | |
27 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 8% | - | |
29 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
30 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
31 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | MUZZI Jessica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - |
33 | MAK Tinney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 60% | |
34 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
35 | KELLY Katherine | 100% | 97% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | |
36 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | 4% | |
37 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
38 | LEE Madison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | - |
39 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - |
40 | DUSINLLEUX Kate D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
41 | FIGUEREDO Maria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
42 | XU Madison | 100% | 97% | 72% | 28% | 3% | - | |
43 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 39% | 6% | - | |
44 | PAGES Melanie | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 4% | - | |
46 | SHORTALL Samantha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
47 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 92% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | |
48 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
49 | BECKER Elena | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
50 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
51 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | MARTIN Georgie | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
53 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 94% | 60% | 16% | - | - | |
54 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 94% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | |
56 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
57 | SHAW Guinevere L. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
58 | MAO Shiyi | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
59 | BAO Andria | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | SHEIN Evita | 100% | 68% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | YANG Liu (Willow) | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | DU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | |
63 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
64 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 91% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
65 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | - | - | |
66 | CHEN Yichun | 100% | 98% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
67 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
68 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
69 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
70 | BROWN Cameryn | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
71 | FENTON Barbara R. | 100% | 44% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.