New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROY Layla | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | ORVANANOS Anice | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | WU Celine | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | MI Aileen | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | GOOR Viviene E. | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | YURKOVA Mariia | D V D V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | ZHOU olivia | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 10 | SHA Yi Ling | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LIAW Elaine | V V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | PAULUS Isabella | V V V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 13 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | YANG Iris | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | CASCONE Emily | D V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 16 | HOU Wendong | D D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | CHO Rebecca H. | D V V V V V | D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 18 | CHAGARES Isabella | D V D V V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 19 | KAZA Nitya V. | D V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | D V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | SEAH Dana | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | AO Alyssa | D V V D V D | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 23 | CHEN Renee | V D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | JIANG Claire | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | ZHOU Sophia | D V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | SHMAY Anastasia | D D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 27 | GAO Anna | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | ADVINCULA Allegra | D V D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 29 | PARSONS Leada | D D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | WANG Sophie | D V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 31 | WANG Sabrina | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | GREENLEAF Ella | D D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | V D D V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 34 | CHEN Thea | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | SCHULTZ Norah | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | VENKATESH Isha | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | WANG Jolie Z. | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 38 | PAULUS Sloane | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 39 | MORGESON Olivia | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 40 | ZHANG Ivy | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 41 | DALBERG Meadow | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 42 | DALBERG Violet | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.