New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% |
| 2 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% | 3% |
| 5 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 6 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 7 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 8 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 9 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
| 10 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 11 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 12 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 13 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 14 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 15 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 14% |
| 16 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 18 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 19 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 20 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 22 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 24 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 30 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 99% | 79% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 34 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 36 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 41 | FU Qihan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | YANG Liu (Willow) | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | MI Anning | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 98% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 47 | BROWN Cameryn | 100% | 98% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | GINDE Maithili | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | JANNACCIO morgan | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 54 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | WALLACE Susannah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | BAMFORD Anna | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | YU Hannah | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | YEUNG Cherry | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | CHEN Miley | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.