Texas Fencing Academy - Austin, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | REINISCH Michael A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | |
| 2 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 3 | FLYNN Anthony L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 9% | |
| 3 | HOLCOMB Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 5 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 6 | DEDMAN Ruben | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 7 | LIM Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 25% | |
| 8 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | GILSBACH Ben | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 10 | CRAVEY Michael L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 11 | NIXON Scott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 13 | PATEL Avi S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | LOBO Mauricio | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 15 | MITCHELL Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 63% | 17% | |
| 16 | WOODALL Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% | |
| 17 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 19 | FOX Joshua | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 20 | HORD Jacob | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | HUANG Selina | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | TRAN Duc | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 23 | RASMUSSEN Eric | 100% | 90% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | RILEY Christian | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% | |
| 26 | LI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 27 | JENSEN Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | VAN NOSTRAND Susan C. | 100% | 86% | 43% | 7% | - | - | |
| 29 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | GLORIA LILIANA | 100% | 98% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | ELLMER Ava | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | THOMAS Joshua | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | AZIMI Ariana | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | VAN PELT Charlotte | 100% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | NANCE Hogan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | ROSSBACH Christopher | 100% | 96% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MCDADE Sonya | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.