Charlotte Convention Center - Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
2 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
3 | ZOLLER Noelle | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | ||
3 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
5 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
6 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
7 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
8 | WANG Jiayi | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
9 | WANG Callie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
10 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
11 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
12 | DHAR Rana | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
13 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
14 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
15 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
16 | OCA Merci | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
17 | LIN Nicole | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
18 | HU Anna | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
19 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
20 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
21 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
22 | DANTULURI Shalini | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
23 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
24 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
24 | MUND Ruth | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
26 | HSU Leah | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
27 | WONG Natalie | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
28 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
29 | PABIAN Emilia | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 16% | ||
30 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
31 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
32 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
33 | BERMAN greta | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
34 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
35 | BROWN Aria | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
36 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
37 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
38 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
39 | UEMOTO Lynn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
40 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
41 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
42 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
43 | GONG Joy | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
44 | YAM Danika | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
45 | WEI JoyAnn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
46 | YUEN Nicole | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
47 | AWAD Royce | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
48 | KIM Satie | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
49 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
50 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
51 | KAUL Tara | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
52 | CONG Anne | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 5% |
53 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
54 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
55 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
55 | LONG Jessie | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
57 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
58 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
59 | KANG Ellie | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
60 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
61 | REN Katherine | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
62 | CHERON Helene | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
63 | NG Sophia | 2% | 14% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
64 | KWON Ava | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
65 | DHAR Layla | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
66 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
67 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
68 | BUSH Bethany | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
69 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
70 | LO Chloe | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
70 | LEOU Korina | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
72 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
73 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
74 | CHIANG Melissa | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
75 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
76 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
77 | FAN Alexandria | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
78 | DAVIDOVA Kira | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
79 | BAIK Sarah | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | ||
80 | LIM Jaslene | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
80 | ZENG Sarah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
82 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
82 | KU Chloe | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
84 | CHEN Elaine | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
84 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
86 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
87 | NIU Jessica | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
87 | GAY Sasha | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
89 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
89 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
91 | KIM Saeren | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
92 | TONG Laurie | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
93 | LUKER Hannah | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
94 | STADNIK Emilia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
95 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
96 | XIE Nora | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
97 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
98 | LIU Hannah | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
99 | FUNG Iris | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
100 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
101 | JOHNSON Heaven | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
102 | GOLDIN Nina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 21% |
103 | BORTAI Eliza | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
104 | NING Lynn | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
105 | LIU kai yin aria | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
106 | CHOI Charlotte | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
107 | DONG Angel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
108 | BERNARD Kathryn | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
109 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
110 | STONE Coral | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | ||
111 | XIAO Cindy | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
112 | HUANG Neila | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
113 | CHAMI Lana | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
114 | CHEN Kevy | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
115 | WANG JiaQi | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
116 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
117 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
118 | MCAFEE Jada | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
119 | HUSS Miriam | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
120 | CHANG Norah | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
121 | LIU Hannah | 2% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
122 | YU Stella | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
123 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
124 | ZAWADA Milena | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
125 | PADANILAM Lily | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
126 | JONES Nima | 51% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
127 | MYAT Chloe | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
128 | KIM Grace | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
129 | JACHYMIAK Emilia | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
130 | PASUPULETI Laya | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
131 | HUANG Pierra | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
132 | KIM Grace | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
133 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
133 | LOMOTAN Addison | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
135 | CHI Claire | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
136 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
137 | MUNGUIA Mila | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
138 | SHEARER Alena | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
139 | BORGUETA Madison | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
140 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
141 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
141 | HEATH Isabella | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
143 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
144 | SINGER Ellery | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
145 | HSIEH Lucia | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
146 | MAK Kaitlin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
147 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
148 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
149 | ROOPRAI Amarjot | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
150 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
151 | YADAV Tishya | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
152 | JOHNSON Neema | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
153 | WALLER London | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
154 | PRESANTH Nandana | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
155 | LIN Annika | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
156 | VATS Ishita | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
157 | KIM Karen | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
158 | PARK Haylie | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
159 | MING Emma | 10% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
160 | HWANG Charlotte | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
161 | RANJAN Diya | - | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
162 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
163 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
163 | ZHAO Selena | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
165 | LEIGH Adalene | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
166 | PHAN Genevieve | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
167 | BARNES Sarah | 6% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
168 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
168 | MAK Jayden | 4% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
170 | TEYSSIER Katherine | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
170 | LEE Kaitlin | 6% | 34% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
172 | SNOAD Indy | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
173 | YU Skylar | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
174 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
175 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
176 | ZHANG Ashley | 1% | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
177 | MEYERSON Michelle | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
178 | KIM Audrey | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
179 | DEHON Inès | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
180 | CHANG Annette | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
181 | AKULA Roszlynn | 4% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
182 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
183 | MUELLER Sarah | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
183 | LAFFY Lily | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
185 | WONG Charlene | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
186 | WONG Cerise | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
187 | TISSONE Veronica | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
188 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
188 | ALDORT Amanda | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
190 | POLSTON Ella | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
191 | KONZEN Iris | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
192 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
193 | KANG Soeun | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
194 | SAMPATH Medha | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
195 | KINKADE Ellie | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% | |
196 | ZHAI AMY | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
197 | PROBASCO Leila | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
197 | RIFKIN Lielle | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
199 | CAO arissa | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
200 | CAI Veronica | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
201 | YAO Reeva | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
202 | HAN Emma | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
202 | ASPIRAS Avery | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
204 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 27% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
204 | LIM Eunice | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
206 | NGUYEN Madeleine | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
207 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
208 | ZONG Eliane | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
209 | FLEEGER Sophia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
210 | LIANG Claire | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
210 | NICHOLAS Eva | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
212 | IREGUI Sofia | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
213 | SUN Angela | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
214 | YOON Sela | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
215 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
215 | SEBASTIAN Ava | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
217 | YE Madeleine | 14% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
218 | ERHART MATILDA | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
219 | JOSHI Samika | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
220 | WILFRET Katerina | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
221 | COOVADIA Malina | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | ||
222 | WU Chloe | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
222 | ROMAN Clarissa | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
224 | SANTOS Charlize | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
225 | DOLEV Rony | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
226 | MANI Francesca B. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
226 | MEFFORD Isadora | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
228 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
228 | ZHANG Erica | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
230 | ORLOVA Anastasia | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
230 | PATIL Jyothi | 49% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
232 | LOZIER Camryn | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
233 | COX catie | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
233 | MUKHERJEE Moupriya | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
233 | YANKIN Kayra | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
233 | GUO Yuexi | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
237 | ESPINOSA Rachel | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
237 | GUENDULAY Hallise | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
237 | GODFREY Crystal | 7% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
240 | INNASIMUTHU Michelle | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.