October NAC

Div II Women's Épée

Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MCLANE Lauren 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
2 KIM Diane E. 100% 99% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
3 QURESHI Aafreen 100% 100% 98% 84% 42% 8%
3 CHAN Paree A. 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 4%
5 BELAOUSSOFF Kira 100% 100% 99% 90% 67% 33% 7%
6 ZAFFT Tatiana M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 29%
7 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
8 NGUYEN Kaylin A. 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
9 JOBALIA Ria 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 13% 1%
10 LONG Cindy 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 16%
11 SU Nicole 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 9%
12 BARNES Olivia R. 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 22% 4%
13 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
14 PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) 100% 99% 88% 59% 23% 4%
15 ROBERTS Gabrielle W. 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 13% 1%
16 LEE Michelle 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 10%
17 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
18 XIA Chelsea W. 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 11%
19 DESJARDINS Rosalie 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 14% 2%
20 HU Grace 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 13%
21 MUCSI Angela Lilla 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
22 LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 8%
23 YOON Julia J. 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 1%
24 CHIN Isabella 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 13%
25 ZHANG Rachel 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 13%
26 LU Shiqi 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 5%
27 LEE Sumin 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 7%
28 LEANG Andrea K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
29 DILAWRI Anika 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 6%
30 JI Catherine 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 9% 1%
31 CAO Catherine H. 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% -
32 KOWALSKY Rachel A. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
33 GANDHI Sedna S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
34 KUZNETSOV Victoria 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 6%
35 NI Emma 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 10%
36 SEMIKIN Julia 100% 99% 94% 76% 45% 16% 2%
37 LEE Olive 100% 100% 96% 79% 48% 18% 3%
38 ROBERTSON Lily 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 3%
39 MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 56% 16%
40 LEE kyungmin 100% 99% 89% 59% 25% 6% -
41 CHAN Elizabeth 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
42 SOIN Anika A. 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 21% 3%
43 NING Emma 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 35% 8%
44 HAN Jaewon(Leah) 100% 97% 80% 47% 17% 3% -
44 LEANG Priscilla Y. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 9%
46 YOUNG Ashley 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 18% 3%
47 LIU Christina A. 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5%
48 BELSLEY Devon K. 100% 98% 84% 52% 18% 2%
49 WILEY Erica 100% 100% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
50 SAAL Anna 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
51 ANDERSON Nora E. 100% 98% 85% 56% 24% 5% -
52 TIMMONS Sarah J. 100% 98% 87% 61% 29% 8% 1%
53 CHIODI Isabella M. 100% 100% 97% 85% 58% 25% 5%
54 ZHOU Lei 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
55 CHEN Alina 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% -
56 TOMASELLO Olivia E. 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 7%
57 ERTAS Eileen 100% 99% 88% 55% 18% 2%
58 REID Sobia 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 12%
59 SEMMEL Rose F. 100% 96% 75% 41% 13% 2% -
60 OH Kaitlin Y. 100% 90% 60% 25% 5% - -
61 AHUJA Arianna 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
62 MARONEY Gianna 100% 98% 87% 57% 24% 5% -
63 JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
64 TOFFELMIRE Amelia A. 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
65 O'REILLY Aeryn E. 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
66 CARVALHO Maia D. 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 43% 9%
67 EXCONDE Solana M. 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1%
68 REITINGER Emilie B. 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 16% 2%
69 LIN Katie Y. 100% 98% 84% 53% 22% 5% -
70 PRIMES Amanda M. 100% 82% 41% 11% 1% - -
70 DIDONATO Gianina L. 100% 88% 53% 19% 4% - -
72 YAO Jillian 100% 98% 87% 61% 29% 8% 1%
73 LIN Julia L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 49% 14%
74 TAYLOR Beth 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
75 KETKAR Mallika 100% 98% 84% 49% 14% 1%
76 SCHLIEP Anna J. 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1%
77 ADVINCULA Anabella E. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 8%
78 BECCHINA Olivia 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
79 DINGMAN Amanda 100% 97% 80% 48% 18% 4% -
80 APONTE Monica I. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 2%
81 SIBLEY Elisabeth J. 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
82 PANDEY Sana 100% 100% 96% 81% 51% 20% 3%
83 EBRAHIM Ameera H. 100% 97% 81% 48% 18% 3% -
84 HEINRICH Eva 100% 90% 59% 24% 5% -
85 ZHENG Ava 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% -
86 MIZZI Keira 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
87 COOPER Tina M. 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 6%
88 BURN Lauren M. 100% 98% 85% 55% 20% 3% -
89 BOLES Savvianna 100% 93% 68% 32% 9% 1% -
90 WANG anne 100% 92% 64% 29% 7% 1% -
91 BECKER Carson E. 100% 98% 86% 59% 26% 6% 1%
91 STOJANOVIC Mina 100% 99% 87% 53% 18% 3% -
93 MOK Chloe R. 100% 99% 90% 65% 32% 9% 1%
94 MUELLER Victoria E. 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3%
95 ZHANG Katherine 100% 100% 92% 65% 28% 6% -
96 HAMILTON Nina M. 100% 94% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
97 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 9% 1%
98 GOLDBERG Sophie C. 100% 100% 97% 84% 57% 25% 5%
98 KWON Tiara 100% 96% 77% 45% 16% 3% -
100 ZUZULO Tiah C. 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1% -
101 DU Yiyun (Doreen) 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
102 WALLACE Madison K. 100% 96% 77% 43% 15% 2% -
103 LI Tiffany 100% 90% 57% 19% 2% -
104 PHAM Evelyn L. 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1%
105 WON Jenny 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1%
106 KIM Elizabeth Y. 100% 82% 42% 12% 2% -
107 POPOVICI Astrid I. 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% -
108 LIEBER Josephine A. 100% 88% 50% 15% 2% -
109 CAPELLUA Mariasole 100% 88% 55% 22% 5% - -
110 ROWLAND May 100% 88% 56% 21% 4% - -
111 SHUM Jessica 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
112 LUNSFORD Marlie G. 100% 91% 62% 25% 5% - -
113 CZARNY Kathrina 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
114 NICOU Nicole 100% 99% 91% 67% 33% 9% 1%
115 XU GRACE (XIN YI) 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% - -
116 WANG Nora 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 21% 3%
117 RAZA Nadia A. 100% 90% 59% 24% 6% 1% -
118 NOBLE Adara 100% 99% 92% 71% 38% 12% 2%
119 SCHAFF Marlene M. 100% 92% 61% 23% 4% - -
120 GERARDIN Marie 100% 86% 48% 13% 1% -
121 ANDERSON Avery 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
122 BENKLER Riley M. 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
123 WILKENS Patricia A. 100% 83% 42% 10% 1% - -
123 KIM Erika S. 100% 86% 50% 16% 3% - -
125 MANDEL Helen (Jenner) 100% 88% 50% 14% 2% - -
126 GROCE Linda J. 100% 87% 52% 17% 2% -
127 TERRELL Gabriella 100% 80% 39% 11% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.